This project is being part-financed by the European Union European Regional Development Fund

CWA Blog

SRDP: Chaos or Conspiracy?
Posted by admin on 05/11/2009 at 10:34 AM

A number of changes to the LEADER programme were announced recently, with much fanfare and to widespread approval: increases in the maximum intervention rates from 50% to 90% for LEADER itself and from 35% to 50% for the associated Convergence funding (in the old Objective 1 area only), and the transfer to LEADER of two Rural Priorities Options - "Community Services and Facilities" & "Collaborative Local Development Strategies".

Good news indeed, you might think, that 3 years into a 7 year programme they are finally getting all the bits in the right place (where many had suggested they should be all along). However, what hasn’t been announced quite so loudly is that the Government intend transferring the responsibility for funding these options from Rural Priorities to LEADER…but none of the budget. So the tiny LEADER budget. £38m for all of Scotland over 7 years, is now supposed to be stretched to cover village hall improvements, playparks, and indeed many potential facilities in community woodlands… no doubt freeing up even more of the supposed "Rural Development" funding to go straight in farmers pockets.

Is this just another case of SEERAD/SGRPID/whateverthey’recalledthisweek incompetence, or more evidence of their utter contempt for community scale activity and determination to keep subsidising agribusiness in any way possible? You decide! Meanwhile, however, the LEADER local groups are quite rightly rebelling against the proposals, leaving community projects stuck in limbo, with more yet delays ahead while the mess is sorted out. Will the SRDP chaos ever end??
Jon

Next entry: It's a good thing trees are made of wood...

Previous entry: What is the land for?


Comments
Posted by Diane on 19/11/2009 at 07:52 AM
UPDATE From Scottish Government
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/farmingrural/SRDP/RuralPriorities/WhatsNew

"In response to concerns raised by stakeholders, it has been agreed that, for a transitional period, we will continue to accept and progress CSF applications under Rural Priorities.
Applicants should therefore note that, as previously announced, the November RPACs will consider CSF projects as usual.
We can also confirm that projects containing CSF options which meet the appropriate January deadlines and information requirements can be assessed at the RPACs scheduled for March 2010, where the 90% grant rate announced by the Cabinet Secretary will apply.
Projects still in development should continue to follow Rural Priorities guidance and timescales, in consultation with Case Officers. Details on the arrangements for assessment beyond the March RPACs will be announced in due course."

Posted by Tina on 18/11/2009 at 09:02 PM
This will only confuse the situation further. LEADER funding is almost impossible to get - they want to micromanage everything, including recruitment of contract staff when they don´t understand the project. This is our experience. It involves too much (unpaid) time spent on trying to access the funding.

Posted by sadie on 09/11/2009 at 05:14 PM
What is the point in upping the rate and moving the admin without passing over the cash - seems pointless - why not be honest and do away with it altogether if they no longer want to run the funding? or would the volume of protest hurt their ears a little too much?
How much money is in the community pot if they wake up and do the right thing?


Add Your Comment Here

Name:

Email: (optional)

Community Group / Location:

Smileys

Remember my personal information

Submit the word you see below:


 
69 St Valery Place, Ullapool, Ross-shire. IV26 2TD   Tel/Fax: +44 (0)1854 613737
The Community Woodlands Association is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in Scotland
Company No: 275097 Charity No: SC038374 Registered Office: Old Poltalloch, Kilmartin, Argyll PA31 8RQ
Copyright © 2007 Community Woodlands Association. All rights reserved.